Saturday 25 December 2010

a railway for christmas








the ticket inspector just makes the train.

a polite but inane voice over the PA has already welcomed everyone on board and announced the destination: laufen. the doors start to beep and as they slide shut, he manages to sneak in, relieved. he has a moustache and wears glasses, he's not very tall. 'grüezi mitenand', he says to the people already in the carriage, who look at him a little bemused: surely the midnight train on christmas eve is not one to inspect tickets on? this is a suburban line, after all, where they only do spot-checks, occasionally.

he's carrying his little machine and what looks like a present he's been given, three miniature bottles of wine. he sits down and catches his breath. he takes from his uniform his badge and puts it in his breast pocket. the bemused passengers defrown, one manages a smile: he's off duty, on his way home.

his phone rings. he connects it to his headset and answers. 'paul! [not the real name, obviously] how are you? - no i'm fine thank you. yes, no really: i'm fine. well... there was a little altercation. - yes. - well, there were four of them, they had tickets for zones one to three, so we said to them: you can't stay on this train now, you have to get off, or buy another ticket. - it was all right, there were two of us, so it wasn't too bad: they got quite ...verbally robust, you could call it, but by the time we got to olten, we managed to convince them that they really needed a ticket, but they got off instead. so that's why we ended up with a three minute delay there. - no, no, i'm fine: thank you. i appreciate your call though, these things do shake one up a little. i hope they didn't wake you up on my account? - oh, i'm glad to hear that. - well. merry christmas to you too, goodnight!' and finally, he relaxes.

we've been to our sister's, my mum & dad and i, we sang carols, we exchanged gifts, we had dinner, it was lovely. ours is the next stop, we get off the train and step out into the snow. by now it's christmas. it's going to be a very white one. and what i'm thinking is this: everybody knows that the british railways are absolutely dreadful and the swiss railways are astonishingly brilliant. but today we've experienced a whole range of reasons why:

it's been snowing all day across the country. granted, not very hard, yet, nowhere near as hard as had been predicted, yet, but still. none of our trains, and none of our busses, on a three hour journey there, and a three hour journey back, is delayed by as much as a whisker. on the long-distance double-decker train, the little trolley, which comes through three times during the trip, carries green tea and a proper espresso machine. the ticket inspector on the mainline train back (he's so tall he almost has to walk bent double, but not quite, so as not to bump his head against the ceiling) laughs and jokes with us: 'of course the one day travel card is valid until the last train of the day, whatever time that is past midnight.' my dad wants to be sure: 'so if your colleague tries to charge us a penalty fare, we tell him that mr...' he cranes his neck and glances up at the tall young man to read his name - 'don't you worry', the young man says, 'if he doesn't know this, then he won't be a ticket inspector, haha...'

as it happens, the ticket inspector on the suburban midnight train towards laufen is off duty. but he still takes enough pride in his job to greet his fellow passengers on boarding the train. his line manager is also off duty, he might already have been in bed, though that, as it turns out, wasn't the case in this instance. he is concerned enough about his member of staff to phone him within minutes of what he knows to be his clock-off time. just to make sure. he's able to do so, because somebody else in the organisation has cared enough about their member of staff to inform him, even though he's off duty, that there has been a verbal assault. and did anybody lose their calm or call the police and threaten an arrest or issue penalties or invoke, in some random way, health & safety? clearly not. they used their common sense, and reasoned until reason prevailed. which appears to have been in olten. the cost to the system: a three minute delay. which was taken seriously enough to be logged, of course...

today is christmas. it's still snowing. the swiss trains will be running mostly on time, barring any drunken incidents, one imagines. our not very tall ticket inspector with the moustache, he'll be feeling perfectly fine. it's all been sorted. our very tall ticket inspector without the moustache will be just dandy too, he so much enjoys his job, it's hard to see how he wouldn't. and the four bores who got on a train without a valid ticket last night will probably be nursing their hangover and thinking: 'we were being real bores last night, maybe we don't need to do that again very soon.' harm done: virtually nil. order: virtually perfect. that's why the swiss railways are bliss. is there no way we can ask them to run ours for us?...


love & peace to you all on this, as on any, day
sebastian


Tuesday 14 December 2010

"policing by public consent"

we have in this country, says home secretary theresa may, a 'tradition of policing by public consent' which, she assures us, is to continue. so far so good.

there is a lot of debate to be had about the extent to which policing that entails the practice of 'kettling', of beating someone over the head with a truncheon to the point where they need brain surgery, or dragging someone from their wheelchair, or charging into a crowd on horses at the risk of trampling people who are going about their democratic right to demonstrate, can be said to be happening by 'public consent' and there is plenty of evidence that these are not just idle allegations of policing in london having gone way off anything that i, for example, would ever be happy to consent to.

but leaving these questions, burning though they really are, aside for the time being, another 'tool' for 'crowd control' has been seriously discussed over the last few days, and with it the spectre of a whole new type of violence. water cannon.

theresa may has now 'ruled out' the use of water cannon 'in policing student protests'. but only after doing the precise opposite as recently as sunday when she told sky news that the use of water cannon was up to the police as 'an operational mater'. meanwhile, head of scotland yard's public order branch, bob broadhurst, says it would be "foolish" not to consider their use.

if you want to know what a water cannon does to you if you get it in the face, have a look at this picture of a 66 year old man who took a direct hit in stuttgart, germany, earlier this year, courtesy of his local police force. (word of warning: it's not for the squeamish...)




Friedrich Wagner, after being hit by a water cannon.
Picture: Marijan Murat / dpa
love & peace
sebastian


Monday 13 December 2010

making some noise for the sound of silence



last year it was all about rage and a big noisy track from an american punk band to knock simon cowell's bland x-manufacture off the coveted christmas number one spot in the uk charts. and against all odds, against all predictions and to the joy of millions, it succeeded. rage against the machine's killing in the name beat joe mcelderry's the climb by some 50,000 downloads, clocking up an impressive half million of them and becoming the fastest selling digital track of all time, raising a cool hundred grand for homeless charity shelter in the process.

this year, someone's decided to take it all one step further. the idea has a spark of genius about it and if it succeeds will be the greatest triumph of networked conceptuality over commercialism yet. and like all good ideas it's strikingly simple:

make it about silence. the space between the assaults on our senses that pummel us every minute of every hour of every day. make it about the music inside of each of us. and so a motley crew of quite famous and not-so-famous but nevertheless very with-it artists came together in a soho studio in london last week to record john cage's seminal 4'33". today it was released, and in about the first ten hours or so of it being on iTunes it climbed from rank 171 to rank 31, while on the livehits download tracking site it also reached rank 31.

it's still a fairly tall order to make it to the top, but i reckon it's possible. and what a wondrous joy that would be: for the UK chart to be topped by four minutes and thirty-three seconds of silence. it would be, quite literally, unheard of.

but does it matter? does anyone even care who or what is the christmas number one? perhaps not. there are clearly several hundred thousand other issues, causes, problems, challenges and delights that are signally more important than this. but this is so worth doing: to show the likes of cowell that theirs may be the money but ours is still the imagination, theirs are the means, perhaps, but ours is the power: they have the machine, we have the magic.

and what about matt, the young man who apparently won x-factor this year? i have no idea. i've not been watching the show, i've never clapped eyes on him. my friend charlie tells me he's lovely and extremely attractive to both men and women. so how could i wish him anything but the best. the one thing this certainly isn't about is matt. i congratulate him on his success and wish him many a hit in a wonderful career. it is about machinations though. and throwing a spanner it their works. and what a glorious spanner this would be: 4'33" of silence.

help make it happen at


where you'll find everything you need to know: how to get the track, which charities the money goes to, who's behind it and why. and obviously, please spread the word: it's all got to go through this week!

love & peace
sebastian


Wednesday 24 November 2010

the right to education & the right to protest




this is going to be short and simple:

i fully support the students on their day of protest.

1) all education should be free to and for all, and paid for through progressive taxation

2) the practice of 'kettling' is an indiscriminate form of summary action against demonstrators whether they be peaceful or no and invariably leads to perfectly guiltless individuals being held for hours without access to essential amenities such as water, food, toilets and shelter, and as such constitutes a serious civil and human rights abuse

3) the liberal democrats can not call putting up student fees 'a compromise' and blame it on their role in a coalition government. 'a compromise' to their election promise of abolishing fees would be a serious reduction and gradual phasing out of student fees, not putting them up.

and full marks to joana pinto from the national committee against cuts for her performance on BBC news 24 today: competent, reasonable and unapologetic.

power to the people
peace & love

Friday 9 April 2010

vote



i'm going to steer well clear of politics, don't worry.

but since there's a general election underway, and while democracy is still the least worst option, it would seem, that we have for what passes as a political system, and most particularly as this year's voting round may, for the first time in ages, produce what the libdems have taken to calling a 'balanced' (as opposed to a 'hung') parliament, i reckon it's worth pondering one particular thought:

what would happen if we voted purely on policy, instead of according to which party's brand image we have come to vaguely (or even strongly) identify with, instead of the personalities we've come to like, love, or, more often than not, loathe, instead of the tradition that may or may not run in the family or the community, and especially instead of who we think can actually win our seat.

if there is a significant chance of a balanced parliament, or even a hung one, for that matter, then this latter consideration - who can actually win my seat - does in fact largely pale into insignificance. unless you want to positively vote one party into government, or actively want to remove a party from government, you can consider the question who wins your seat, and therefore by extension who wins most seats, no more than perhaps technically relevant (in as much as which party will field how big a contingent and therefore have how much clout in a coalition) and concentrate much more on who will get your snippet of the share of the vote. and on this occasion, share of the vote may matter more than it usually does, because if there is a hung parliament, and therefore a coalition, it will very likely lead to a reform of the voting system to either full proportional representation or to something relatively close to it. the greater the discrepancy between seats in the house and share of the vote, the more compelling the argument for a voting system that more accurately reflects voters' wishes.

but even if you're not interested in a hung parliament, even if you'd just find it refreshing and thought it would make sound political sense for us to vote in accordance with policies we actually support, rather than with how effectively the campaign machinery bludgeons us into buying the party leaders' message, then luckily, help is at hand:

on voteforpolicies.org.uk you can find out precisely who you should vote for, based purely on the policies six parties are putting forward. the site has no political affiliation, it doesn't try to sway or persuade you, it doesn't try to sell you antyhing and it doesn't come with any bias or hidden agenda. it just presents you nine major policy areas, of which you can choose any that interest you, from a minimum of four to the maximum nine. and then it tells you in brief bullet point summary what each party's policy is on that issue. except, and herein lies the brilliant thing, it doesn't tell you which policy belongs to which party. it just asks you to choose the policy you most agree with, and then you move on to the next issue. after you've made a selection for each of the issues that interest you, it spends a few seconds computing the result and then, ptaa!, reveals who the policies that you've gone for belong to.

obviously, you can then make up your own mind who you're actually going to give your vote to. just don't be surprised if the result surprises you...

this is how parties' policies stood after 59,411 completed surveys, on 8th april 2010:




to complete the survey and find out whose policies are up your street, go to voteforpolicies.org.uk - it may be the most eye-opening ten minutes you'll spend in this election.


sebastian's website sebastian on facebook